Probably better to report the bug and don't use the method until Evernote publishes a proper fix.Evernote has always been open about how we protect our users’ data. Also you'd have to maintain the hack through updates. This is a massive hack however and although I don't think any other note store methods will be impacted adversely by it, it's possible that other internal user store or other calls will suddenly start acting funny.
#Evernote hacked 2019 code#
Rebuild the project and you should find that your code snippet works as expected. Find the method +sendMessage:toProtocol:withArguments. In the SDK files, which you'll need to build as part of your project, find the ObjC file called ENTProtocol.m. You can hack in the correct protocol behavior. Of course, you may really want to use the access-by-hash pattern. let resourceData = note?. and you're good! You can also pull individual resources by their own guid (not their hash), using fetchResource (use note?.resources.guid as the param). You can get resource data in different ways: First of all, you actually got all the data you needed in the response to your fetchNote call, i.e. And if you hack up the iOS SDK to do the same thing, it will work, too.īest advice is to report the bug and just avoid this method on the note store.
If you dig into the more recent Python version of the SDK, or indeed also the Java/Android version, you can see a different pattern for this method: it says it's going to write a string-type field, and then actually emits a binary one. This could reflect evolution in the API definition, but more likely this has always been broken in the iOS SDK ( getResourceByHash probably doesn't see a lot of usage). The service is failing to parse the request, so you're seeing a generic error on the client.
But it turns out the client is sending the hash value as a purely binary field. You are invoking the underlying getResourceByHash API method on the note store, which is defined per the docs to accept a string type for the contentHash argument. The SDK framework includes a layer of autogenerated stub code that is supposed to marshal input and output params correctly for each request and response. First the analysis and then your workarounds.Įvernote's underlying API transport uses a Thrift protocol with a documented schema.
This is a bug in the SDK's "EDAM" Thrift client stub code. Would be great to know if this is an sdk bug or I am still doing something wrong. so this is not an issue with auth tokens)
#Evernote hacked 2019 android#
The equivalent setup works on Android SDK.Įverything else works so far in IOS SDK (chunkSync, auth, getting notebooks etc.
#Evernote hacked 2019 download#
Just for this example, to be 100% sure about the hash being correct I first download the note with a single resource using fetchNote and then request this resource using its unique hash using fetchResourceByHashWith (hash looks correct when I print it) ()?.fetchNote(withGuid: guid, includingContent: true, resourceOptions: ENResourceFetchOption.includeData, completion: ) I would like to retrieve a specific resource from note using fetchResourceByHashWith
0 kommentar(er)
